|
Rolling Back The Rules Not a Step Forward
A court decision affecting the work hours of professional truck drivers could erase a rule that contributed to a 4.7 percent decline in large truck related crash deaths in 2006 — unless cooler heads prevail. Unfortunately, reactions to the court decision have been uninformed and have narrowly focused on a single aspect of the regulations.
In July, however, the United States Court of Appeals ruled that FMCSA must provide better justification for adopting two provisions governing driver work and rest time. The two provisions in question are those that set maximum driving time at 11 hours per shift and allow truck drivers the ability to re-start their work week after at least 34 consecutive hours of rest. Under the current rules, the allowed driving time was increased by one hour to a total of 11 hours (the previous limit was 10 hours). Critics fixate on this change, contending that increased driving time could lead to more accidents. But it is important to consider that at the same time, mandatory rest time was also increased significantly and the overall length of a work shift was reduced. Critics need to consider the totality of the regulations and their actual effect on safety, rather than to focus on a single change. Currently, drivers must take at least 10 hours of rest between every work shift — an increase of 2 hours of rest from the old rules. And work shifts are now capped at 14 consecutive hours — reduced from the previous 15 hours, which was not consecutive and could be stopped and started throughout a lengthy shift. Drivers are now also permitted to “restart” their work week after taking at least 34 consecutive off-duty hours. This promotes a more regular work–rest cycle for drivers. Unfortunately, the U.S. Court of Appeals’ ruling will actually eliminate the ability to restart the driver’s clock after 34 consecutive hours of rest. Without this provision, truck drivers are more likely to have irregular work schedules, which will cause more fatigue. Many of the truck drivers that we have heard from favored the voluntary 34-hour restart because it encourages drivers to take a break long enough to become fully rested, yet it also allows their driving schedule to coexist with natural sleep rhythms. Contrary to statements made by truck industry critics, the court’s ruling was procedural in nature. It is misleading to suggest, as some have, that the legal decision serves as evidence that the HOS regulations promulgated in 2005 are unsafe. (The evidence, in fact, is to the contrary.) For its part, the American Trucking Associations is seeking a stay from the Court to keep the current rules in place in order to allow FMCSA to address the procedural flaws that were identified. ATA has also asked Secretary of Transportation Mary Peters to push for a stay of the Court of Appeals ruling, as there was no compelling safety reason to eliminate the two provisions the Court challenged. The transition to the current HOS rules required significant operational changes and challenges for the trucking industry. Shifting gears again would force motor carriers to retrain millions of drivers and undo technological changes they have made to accommodate the current rules. At the same time, a disruption in the enforcement of the hours-of-service regulations would ensue. In the past year, trucking’s challenges have been overcome, and the new rules have contributed to enhanced truck safety Statistics bear this out: The U.S. Department of Transportation recently issued its truck-involved fatality figures for 2006. The number of fatalities declined by 4.7 percent from 2005 to 2006, the largest drop in 14 years. The fatality rate is now at its lowest point ever. These facts speak volumes. Furthermore, a study by the American Transportation Research Institute found that most drivers experienced less fatigue and preferred the 11 hours driving, 10 hours off, and 34-hour restart provisions.
The motor carrier industry and ATA’s members understand their responsibility to
the motoring public and the competitive advantage of operating safely and
securely. The No. 1 commodity delivered by truck is safety.
| |||